You know, my reading has been very ecclectic of late: with common ground, but contradictory. With repeated themes but viewed with different paradymes. Some well known, some totally unknown. Subjects ranging as far as psychology, phylosophy, religion, politics... (I've been using my bus time well! x) If I allowed these new thoughts true entry into my brain and heart they would pivot me in new ways and new paths.
No matter what I read I'm usually very good at filtering the new information into
a) The brain. Archived as information or culture, but not really letting it seep into me or
b) My heart. Where I allow thoughts the liberty to materialize in my behavior or worldview.
But now my own logic has been trying to make me adjust my judgement. So I would come back with my head full of new information and my heart filled with confusion.
Thankfully, the wave has passed and reflecting on all this I've come to see this process in a different light.
Of course I'll find different viewpoints than I'm used to if I don't discriminate my readings. If I wanted to avoid the clash of ideas I would discriminate what I read and shut myself up in my comfort zone. But I don't want to do that, I refuse.
On the other hand, it's perfectly normal to encounter new things, it's healthy. It's part of the thesis + antithesis = sinthesis that flows in this dialectic world. It's necessary.
Hmmm...
Never put yourself in that "comfort zone", as you want to call it. Always look for a second opinion on any topic.
ResponderEliminarStay cautious.
-Publius.
I know! I'd compare it to the feat of opening up your heart knowing the whole time you can get hurt, but in this case the mind x)
ResponderEliminar